|
Sexual Behavior -
Current Topics in Applied Ethology and Clinical Methods
Sue M
McDonnell
Equine Behavior Laboratory
University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine
New Bolton Center, Kennett Square, PA USA
Voice 610-444-5800
Fax 610-925-8124
suemcd@vet.upenn.edu
Introduction
Social organization and sexual
behavior of horses, both under natural free-ranging conditions and
domestic hand-breeding conditions, have been well described in the
literature over the last several decades (feral horses and ponies: Feist,
1971; Klingel, 1975; Miller, 1981; McCort, 1984; Keiper, 1985; Keiper and
Houpt, 1984; semi-feral and pasture bred domestic horses and ponies:
Tyler, 1972; Bristol, 1975; hand-bred horses and ponies: Asa, 1985; Asa,
1986; McDonnell, 1986; overall review of early work, Waring, 1983).
Modern
stud farm practices vary considerably around the world, but in general
impose considerable differences in sociosexual environment and breeding
behavior from natural conditions for both mares and stallions. Some of the
modern horse husbandry practices are for safety and practicality, but many
are more or less tradition. While
most domestic horses breed successfully under intense domestic management,
there is a considerable amount of sexual behavior dysfunction, and/or
sexual behavior related management and performance problems in horses
managed under these conditions. This
presentation will briefly review hypotheses and examples of work in
applied ethology and veterinary clinical research addressing sexual
behavior of domestic stallions and mares.
General
Management and Handling of Horses for Breeding
From a comparison of sociosexual
environment and breeding behavior of horses under domestic management with
that of free-ranging horses, striking differences can be identified that
may account for some of the more common reproductive behavior problems.
For example, standard stud farm practice includes varying degrees
of social isolation of stallions from mares other than for the few minutes
of breeding contact per service, and not at all outside the breeding
season. In contrast, under natural social systems, a harem stallion
interacts continuously year round with his harem mares.
Similarly, direct contact of stallions is rarely permitted on
modern breeding farms. If a
stallion is the only stallion on a farm, he may be isolated from direct or
fence line contact with any other horses. Where there are multiple stallions on a farm, they are
typically stabled in barns together in individual stalls or paddocks
within close proximity with other mature stallions and away from any
mares. In contrast, under natural conditions, harem stallions interact
regularly in rituals and battles, apparently aimed at establishing and
maintaining an order of dominance. But
at the same time it is normal for stallions under natural sociosexual
conditions to be able to retreat and remain generally at a distance from
other stallions most of the time. Problems
ranging from inadequate libido to overly aggressive behavior and self
directed inter-male aggression (self-mutilation) to specific apparent
preferences and aversions of a significant percentage of breeding
stallions can be logically attributed to inadequate or inappropriate
social exposure (Bedford et al, 2000; McDonnell et al, 1987). Simple
modification of husbandry to better model the natural social environment
of horses, while still considering safety of animals and handlers, is
often immediately effective in overcoming as well as in preventing
behavior problems.
In
the breeding procedure itself, there are some key domestic practices and
stallion-handling difficulties that appear to inadvertently lead to sexual
behavior dysfunction and infertility. For example, on stud farms, standard
breeding shed protocols include varying degrees of mare restraint.
The restraint may interfere with normal interactive behavior,
receptive postures of the mare, the ability of the mare to adequately
support the stallion and to normally facilitate and accommodate
intromission and thrusting. Skilled and informed handling of breeding
animals, while critical to preventing and rehabilitating sexual behavior
dysfunction in mares and stallions, is a “dying art.” (McDonnell et
al, 1994).
Specific Normal Behaviors of Domestic
Horses That Are Misunderstood as Abnormal
Another area of study that
should lead to better welfare and reduce the frequency of reproductive
behavior problems concern normal equid behaviors that are misunderstood as
aberrant or misbehavior in domestic horses.
One example is the behavior known within the horse breeding
industry as masturbation. This involves normal periodic erections and penile movements.
This behavior, both from the descriptive field studies cited above
and in extensive study of domestic horses, is now understood as normal,
frequent behavior of male equids (McDonnell et al, 1991).
Attempting to inhibit or punish masturbation, which is still a
common practice of horse managers regionally around the world, often leads
to increased masturbation and disturbances of normal breeding behavior
(McDonnell and Hinze, in preparation).
Play
sexual behavior in young horses is another example of a normal, frequent
equine behavior that is commonly misunderstood as abnormal.
All major elements of both male and female behavior occur in all
fillies and colts from a few days of age (McDonnell et al, 1998). Play
sexual behavior directed toward the dam usually peaks during her estrus. Play sexual behavior with foal cohorts continues for fillies
until maturity; with colts it is more frequent and continues into maturity
as a bachelor stallion. Simply understanding that these interactions are
normal and possibly important to development should reduce managers’
concerns about the behavior and practices aimed at eliminating it.
Social Modulation of Stallion Reproductive
Function
It has long been established
that in equid breeding systems some of the mature stallions gain access to
a harem or breeding territory, and some remain non-breeding
“bachelors” (Keiper, 1985; Klingel, 1975, 1982). Important behavioral and physiological differences resulting
from harem or bachelor social status are just recently being understood
and appreciated. Harem status
imparts an upgrading of reproductive endocrinology and function including
increased androgen levels, sexual and aggressive behavior, accessory sex
gland size and character, testicular size and character, and semen
quality; bachelor status imparts changes in the opposite direction
(McDonnell and Murray, 1995).
Traditional
group housing of stallions may inadvertently impose bachelor status on
breeding stallions. For
example, stabling of stallions in barns with other stallions led to
suppressed reproductive function, including lower sexual interest and
arousal, compared to stabling as the only stallion with mares.
Both in normal research animals and in clinical cases of sexual
behavior dysfunction, we have found that simply manipulating the amount of
ongoing exposure that a stallion has to mares and other stallions can
markedly affect libido, testosterone levels, testicular volume, and sperm
production efficiency. On most farms, sociosexual conditions can usually
be easily manipulated to effect physiological and behavioral conditions
corresponding to those of bachelor and harem status (McDonnell, 1995).
Pharmacologic Aids for
Modifying Sexual Behavior
Another growing area of
study regarding sexual behavior of horses concerns the development of
pharmacologic aids to modifying sexual behavior.
To date there are reasonably effective protocols for enhancing and
suppressing sexual behavior both for mares and stallions.
Approaches include psychotropic and endocrine agents (reviews,
McDonnell, 1992, 1999a, b). Most
recent promising work involves development of methods of reversible
chemical castration, using GnRH super agonists to down-regulate the
pituitary-gonadal axis (PF Daels and B Colenbrander, personal
communication).
References
Asa
CS (1986) Sexual behavior of mares. Veterinary Clinics of North America
Equine Practice Vol 2 (3): 519-534.
Asa
CS, Goldfoot DA, Ginther OJ (1979) Sociosexual behavior and the ovulatory
cycle of ponies (Equus caballus) in harem groups. Horm Behav 13:
49-65.
Bedford
SJ, McDonnell SM, Tulleners E, King D, Habecker P (2000) Squamous cell
carcinoma of the urethral process in a horse with hemospermia and
self-mutilation behavior. J A m Vet
Med Assoc 216(4): 551-553.
Bristol
F (1982) Breeding behavior of a stallion at pasture with 20 mares in
synchronized oestrus. J Reprod Fert Suppl 32: 71-77.
Feist
JD (1971)
Behavior of feral horses in the Pryor Mountain Wild Horse Range.
Master’s thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Keiper
R (1985) The Assateague Ponies.
Tidewater Publishers, Centreville, Maryland.
Keiper
R, Houpt K (1984) Reproduction in feral horses: An eight-year study. Am
J Vet Res 45: 991-995.
Klingel
H (1975) Social organization of reproduction in equids. JReprod Fert
Suppl 23: 7-11.
McCort
WD (1984) Behavior of feral horses and ponies. J Anim Sci 58 (2):
493-499.
McDonnell
SM (1986) In Houpt KA, Crowell-Davis S (Eds), Veterinary Clinics of
North America Equine Practice 2 (3)(Behavior): 535-555.
McDonnell
SM (1995) Stallion behavior and endocrinology.
What do we really know? Proceedings
Annual Meeting American Association of Equine Practitioners.
Lexington, KY.
McDonnell
SM (1992) Normal and abnormal sexual behavior.
In Blanchard TL, Varner DD (Eds), Veterinary Clinics of North
America Equine Practice, Stallion Management 8 (1): 71-89.
McDonnell
SM (1999a) Stallion sexual behavior.
In Samper J (Ed), Equine
Breeding Management and Artificial Insemination.
WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 53-66.
McDonnell
S M (1999b) Libido, erection, and ejaculatory dysfunction in stallions. Compendium 21 (3):
263-266.
McDonnell
SM (2000) Reproductive behavior of stallions and mares: comparison of
free-running and domestic in-hand breeding.
Anim Reproduc Sci 60-61: 211-219.
McDonnell
SM, Diehl NK, Oristaglio Turner RM (1994) Modification of unruly breeding
behavior in stallions. Comp
on Cont Ed17 (3): 411-417.
McDonnell
SM, Lutz, MM, Ewaskiewicz EH, Ruducha A (1998) Ontogeny of sexual behavior
of foals in an established semi-feral population. Proceedings VII IERS,
Pretoria, South Africa.
McDonnell
SM, Henry M, Bristol F (1991) Spontaneous erection and masturbation in
equids. Proceedings Vth International Equine Reproduction Symposium. JReprod
Fert Suppl 44: 664-665.
McDonnell
SM, Kenney RM, Meirs RS (1987) Self-mutilation in horses.
American Veterinary Society of Animal Behavior Annual Meeting,
Chicago, Illinois, July 20.
McDonnell
SM, Murray SC (1995) Bachelor and harem stallion behavior and
endocrinology. Biol of Reprod Mono 1: 577-590.
Miller
R (1981) Male aggression, dominance, and breeding behavior in Red Desert
feral horses. Z Tierpsych
57: 340-351.
Tyler
SJ (1972) Behavior and social organization of the semi-feral ponies.
Anim Behav Mono 5.
Waring
GH (1983) Horse Behavior: The Behavioral Traits and Applications of
Domestic and Wild Horses, Including Ponies. Noyes Publications, Park
Ridge, New Jersey.
|