|
Recent
Advances in the Treatment of Equine Stereotypic Behaviour
Daniel Mills
Animal Behaviour Cognition and Welfare Group
University of Lincoln
Caythorpe Campus, Lincs NG32 3EP UK
Voice 01400 275629 Fax
01400 275686
dmills@dmu.ac.uk
Introduction
Stereotypic
behaviour has been defined as behaviours, which are “repetitive and
invariant with no obvious goal or function” (Mason, 1991a) and can be
indicative of a situation in which the animal lacks a certain degree of
control over its environment (Winskill et al, 1995; Fraser and Broom,
1990). Over 15% of domesticated horses have been reported to exhibit what
are commonly termed ‘stereotypies’ (Luescher et
al, 1991). Four behaviours are most commonly described as
stereotypic in the horse: weaving, an obvious repetitive lateral swaying
movement of the head, neck, forequarters and sometimes hindquarters; box
walking, circular route tracing within the stable; crib-biting, grasping
of a fixed object with the incisor teeth and engulfing air with an audible
grunt; (McGreevy et al, 1995a) and windsucking a similar behaviour in
which no object is grasped before the characteristic grunt made. Because
of their similarity, the latter two behaviours are commonly classed
together in many studies. Mills et al (2002) in a review of declarations
of animals presented at sales found that the risk of having oral and
locomotor stereotypies were independent of each other, but not the two
forms of locomotor stereotypy. Nicol (1999) also suggests that wood
chewing may be functionally related to the oral stereotypies described, as
it often appears to be a precursor to them. In her review of the various
epidemiological surveys of these behaviours she reports that in the
surveys, the mean rate of each reported in these studies were 4.13% for
cribbing, 3.25% for weaving, 2.20 % for box walking and 11.78% for wood
chewing. The figure varies with management and individual factors (McGreevy
et al, 1995b), but even so this generalisation is probably an
underestimate of the true prevalence as the only longitudinal study
reported to date has generally found much higher rates (10.5%, 4.6%, 2.3%,
30.3% respectively).
Commonly
Reported Techniques and their Reported Efficacy
These behaviours are of welfare concern
(Mason, 1991b) and cause problems for owners and managers, who often
believe the behaviour can be learned, and can harm the horse, resulting in
the use of many techniques aimed at preventing the behaviour. Crib-straps
and anti-weaving bars are used most frequently in this regard, by an
estimated around 60% and 70% of yards in the UK respectively (McBride and
Long, 2001). Other less common techniques include the removal of surfaces
on which cribbing may occur, electrification of cribbing surfaces, the
hanging of obstacles at the front of the stable to prevent weaving, tying
up and obstructing the path of box walkers, (McBride and Long, 2001). It
is however, important to consider the welfare implications of these
techniques, and prevention in the case of stereotypy is a cause for
concern (Cooper and Mills, 1997; McGreevy and Nicol, 1998; Mcbride and
Cuddeford, 2001). A variety of other management changes have been
suggested and these appear to vary in their reported efficacy, (Table 1)
but there have been few experimental studies into these techniques.
Recent
Innovations in the Management of Weaving
Several epidemiological surveys (McGreevy et
al, 1995a; Redbo et al, 1998) have found that weaving tends to be more
common in horses with lower levels of social contact. However, it is
impossible to determine whether this relationship is a causal one from
this type of study, and given the concern owners have in these behaviours
being copied, isolation might reflect a management decision in response to
the identification of the behaviour in an individual. Our own group at the
University of Lincoln (Cooper
et al, 2000; Mills and Davenport, 2002; McAfee et al, 2002) has however
examined this relationship between social contact and weaving
experimentally. Current results are summarised here.
Initial
studies (Cooper et al, 2000) found that horses allowed social contact with
a conspecific through a 1 metre square barred window reduced their weaving
by 97% on average, head-nodding in the stable was also reduced. Comparison
of the effect of a mirror in the same location with social contact found
no significant difference in the two treatments, with on average an 85%
reduction achieved by the increased social contact and a 77% reduction
with the mirrors (Mills and Davenport, 2002). However in all of these
studies treatment was relatively short (1 week) and so a novelty effect
could not be ruled out. McAfee et al (2002) examined the effect of a
mirror over a more prolonged period in a greater variety of settings. All
horses had been known to weave for at least two years, and a consistent
reduction in weaving (by around 97% on average) was again found throughout
the five weeks of treatment. There was also a decrease in repetitive head
nodding and head threats, which has not been reported previously. It is
possible that these effects are related since both stereotypy and
aggression are believed to be a common consequence of frustration (Duncan
and Wood-Gush, 1971).
Implications.
The efficacy of the treatment in a population in which the behaviour has
clearly become established, also questions whether these behaviours become
emancipated as has been suggested for stereotypic behaviour in other
species (Cooper et al, 1996). Two types of repetitive, relatively
invariant behaviour are commonly recognised in man, those, which relate to
the persistent triggering of a specific motor pattern (stereotypy) and
those which relate to attaining a recurrent goal (obsessive-compulsive
behaviours). It may be that this distinction needs to be made when
considering apparently stereotypic behaviour in the horse, since they may
share more with the latter than the former, being less of a fixed
behaviour and more of a fixation, which can be treated by satisfying the
goal. Recently we have examined the nature of the significant factor
further through the use of poster images, and preliminary results suggest
that it is the image of the horse which is the significant
factor producing the effect, further reinforcing the hypothesis,
that weaving occurs as a result of social frustration. These results will
be discussed further at the meeting. Preliminary feedback from case
studies, also suggest that the mirror is effective in reducing box
walking, which is not surprising given the interaction between the
behaviours reported by Mills et al (2002).
Recent
Innovations in the Management of Crib-biting
Both
McGreevy and colleagues (1995a) and Redbo and colleagues (1998) have also
reported that cribbing appears to be associated with the feeding of
concentrates, which supports the observation of Fitzwygram (1911) who
reported that the condition “most commonly … arises from some form of
acidity …of the stomach”. In 1888, Mayhew suggested that the condition
could be prevented if treated in the early stages with “ a lump of
rock-salt in the manger; (and) a large piece of chalk; should these be
unavailing, always damp the food, and, at each time of feeding, sprinkle
magnesia upon it, and mingle a large handful of ground oak-bark with each
feed of corn.” This observation appears to have been forgotten and not
tested experimentally on subjects of any age until recently. In 1997 a
pilot study (Mills unpublished data) was conducted using a commercial
antacid preparation (Rennie, Laboratoires Roche Nicholas SA, France) (Fig
1). This suggested that treatment with antacids might have the potential
to significantly reduce cribbing. Coincidentally at around the same time,
Nicol (1999) was suggesting that these oral behaviours, including wood
chewing, might be an attempt to increase alkaline saliva flow to reduce
the increased acidity associated with feeding concentrate rations. Thus
providing a potentially sound scientific basis to the mechanism behind the
effect seen. Crib-biting in foals has subsequently been found to be
associated with gastric ulceration (Nicol et al, 2001) and we have
recently completed a double-blind placebo-controlled field study into the
use of antacids for the control of cribbing in adult horses (Mills and
Macleod, manuscript submitted). The results of this study will be
presented.
Table 1
Management changes for the control of equine stereotypic behaviour and
their reported success, (data from McBride and Long, 2001)
|
Technique
|
Reported
prevalence of technique (%)
|
Proportion
reporting success (%)
|
|
Reduced
time in stable
|
49.3
|
75.1
|
|
Stable
toys
|
12.3
|
44.7
|
|
Increased
exercise
|
1.4
|
100.0
|
|
Regular
change of horse’s stable
|
9.6
|
70.1
|
|
Increased
social contact
|
9.6
|
70.1
|
|
Exercise
before other horses
|
5.5
|
100.0
|
|
Feed
before other horses
|
4.1
|
100.0
|
|
Increased
hay ration
|
6.8
|
60.3
|
|
More
varied view from stable
|
2.7
|
50.0
|
|
Use
of stable chain instead of a solid door
|
1.4
|
100.0
|
|
Increased
size of stable
|
5.5
|
100.0
|

Fig
1. Effect of six “Rennie” tablets at feeding time on the rate of
cribbing immediately post feeding in a single subject
References
Cooper
JJ, McDonald L, Mills DS (2000) The effect of increasing visual horizons
on stereotypic weaving: Implications for the social housing of stabled
horses. Appl Anim Behav Sci 69: 67-83.
Cooper
JJ, Mills DS (1997) Welfare considerations relevant to behaviour
modification in domestic animals. In Mills DS, Heath SE, Harrington LJ (Eds),
Proceedings First International Conference on Veterinary Behavioural
Medicine, Potters Bar: UFAW, pp 164-173.
Cooper
JJ, Odberg F, Nicol CJ (1996) Limitations on the effectiveness of
environmental improvement in reducing stereotypic behaviour in bank voles
(Clethrioonomys glareolus). Appl Anim Behav Sci 48: 237-248.
Duncan
IJH, Wood-Gush DGM (1971) Frustration and aggression in the domestic fowl.
Anim Behav 20: 500-504.
Fitzwygram
F (1911) Horses and Stables 5th ed., Longmans, Green and
Co London, p 99.
Fraser
AF, Broom DM (1990) Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare. Bailliere
Tindell, London.
Luescher
UA, McKeown DB, Halip J (1991) Reviewing the causes of
obsessive-compulsive disorders in horses. Vet Med 86: 527-531.
Mason GJ (1991a) Stereotypies: A critical
review. Anim Behav 41: 1015-1037.
Mason GJ
(1991b) Stereotypies and Suffering.
Behav Proc 25: 103-115.
Mayhew E (1888) The Illustrated Horse
Doctor 16th ed. WH Allen and Co, London, pp 168-171
McAfee
LM, Mills DS, Cooper JJ (in press 2002) The use of mirrors for the control
of stereotypic weaving behaviour in the stabled horse. Appl Anim Behav
Sci.
McBride SD Cuddeford D (2001) The putative
welfare-reducing effects of preventing equine stereotypic behaviour. Anim
Welf 10: 173-189.
McBride SD, Long L (2001) Management of horses
showing stereotypic behaviour, owner perception and the implications for
welfare. Vet Rec 148: 799-802.
McGreevy
PD, Cripps PJ, French NP, Green LE, Nicol CJ (1995a) Management factors
associated with stereotypic and redirected behaviour in the Thoroughbred
horse. Eq Vet J 27: 86-91.
McGreevy
PD, French NP, Nicol CJ (1995b) The prevalence of abnormal behaviours in
dressage, eventing and endurance horses in relation to stabling. Vet
Rec 137: 36-37.
McGreevy PD, Nicol CJ (1998) Behavioural and
physiological consequences of short term prevention of crib-biting in
Thoroughbred horses. Physiol Behav 65: 15-23.
Mills
DS, Alston RD, Rogers V, Longford NT (2002) Factors associated with the
prevalence of stereotypic behaviour in Thoroughbred horses passing through
auctioneer sales. Appl Anim Behav Sci, in press.
Mills DS, Davenport K (2002) The effect of a
neighbouring conspecific versus the use of a mirror for the control of
stereotypic weaving behaviour in the stabled horse. Anim Sci 74:
95-101.
Mills DS Macleod CA (manuscript submitted) The
response of crib-biting and windsucking horses to dietary supplementation
with an antacid mixture. Appl Anim Behav Sci
Nicol CJ (1999)
Stereotypies and their relation to management. In Harris PA, Gomarsall GM,
Davidson HPB, Green RE (Eds), Proceedings
BEVA Specialist Days on Behaviour and Nutrition, pp 11-14.
Nicol CJ, Wilson AD, Waters AJ, Harris PA,
Davidson HPB (2001) Crib-biting in foals is associated with gastric
ulceration and mucosal inflammation. In Garner JP, Mench JA, Heekin SP (Eds),
Proceedings 35th International Congress of the ISAE. UC Davis
California, p 40.
Redbo
I, Redbo-Tortensson P, Odberg FO, Hedendahl A, Holm J (1998) Factors
affecting behavioural disturbances in race horses. Anim Sci 66:
475-481.
Winskill
LC, Waran NK, Young RJ (1995) Stereotypies in the stabled horse: Causes,
treatments and prevention. Curr Sci 69: 310-316.
|